– Cute animals, parties, buds, all of these good thingslook great on camera, but do they ogle better on a DSLR, or do they examine better onApple’s recent iPhone 11 Pro? You know, there’s onlyone practice to be informed about, and we’re gonna diveinto a late comparison, and you’re coming with me, let’s go.( electronic music) Hey people, how you all doing? Actually, that’s just great. You know, I’m doingpretty great today extremely, because I have my friends withme, Canon and iPhone 11 Pro. They’re really the only friends I have.So, Apple updated the camerasystem in the iPhone 11 Pro and in the iPhone 11, andit’s pretty remarkable. But can it replace a DSLR? There’s weak points and strong point. Let’s take a look at them right now, and you may be thinking, Ken, this is a totally unfair comparison. Yes, of course it’s an unfair similarity. I’m not trying to say what is better, because I don’t really visualize anything is better than anything else. It’s very subjective. I’m just demonstrate youwhat the differences are. Come on, let’s take a look. We’re gonna look at opticalimage stabilization for video, small details and sounds, dynamic array, painting photography, thena little mystery surprise that will test your abilities, so, stick around for that, then we’ll finish off with Night Mode and some other low-light photos.So, to start with I’ve got to say the visual image stabilization in the iPhone 11 Pro is stellar. Now is me abusing the iPhone 11 Pro next to the Canon DSLR here. I did notice when Itook a closer look at it there was sometimes a littlebit of a jerking flow, and I believe that wasthe auto-focus kicking in. I tested it again withthe auto-focus disabled, and I didn’t notice the jerking action. So, continue that in mindif you wanna do a nice dolly handheld shot. Turn off the auto-focus, and then everything will look great, and even just looking atthis video you can see the dynamic range is so much better more. You don’t get all those blow out items like we did with this particular DSLR. Now, knowledge you different DSLRs, different mirrorless cameras, different cinema cameras will all handle dynamic scope differently. But in my dispute, these werethe two things I expended. But now, let’s dive into something else. We’re gonna take a look at thesmall details and the noise.So, on the left I have a phototaken with the iPhone 11 Pro and on the right a photo taken with the Canon EOS 7D Mark II. Now, I’m putting the metadata now for the locateds thatwere used on each machine, but keep in mind, thatstuff is relative as well. ISO 200 is gonna performvery differently on a DSLR than it is on an iPhone. iPhones use fairly low-grade ISO. The focal segments were also the same, give or take a millimeter or two. So, the focal segment isreally small on now,’ cause it’s a small lens, butthe effective focal span is about 50 -ish.But now let’s zoom inand look at some details. I scaled these up in Photoshop by 300% exerting a nearest neighbour re-sampling, which symbolizes all the pixelsare scaled proportionally to preserve the detail. It’s not do any quirks to tryto soften or extend nonsense. It’s all consistent. On the iPhone 11 Prophoto, you’ll see that we’re getting a bit of animpressionist decorate consequence. My friend Delta calls itthat, and that’s probably because of the noise reductionand some of the other processing that theautomatic camera designates inside the Camera app are doing. So, you’ll notice wedon’t have a lot of sound and particle in the iPhone photocompared to the DSLR photo, but we’re getting that kind ofblotchy painting look instead and we’re too get a bit of a fringe around those flower petals. So, we’re losing a good quantity of detail in those small little neighborhoods. On the DSLR, we don’t lose that. Yes, we have a little bit more noise, but that’s relatively easy to remedy with a little of noise reduction.On the iPhone though, welose some of that aspect. Here’s another examplewith a different bloom, and you’ll see if zoom in again, you’ll notice we get a bit of that splotchiness, and thedetails exactly aren’t as penalty. This one ogles quite a bitbetter than the other one. Now, I exactly wanna make a note here. You is no longer able investigate the fullquality of this stuff over YouTube compression, so there is a link in the description whereyou can take a look at these moves in full res PNG beautiful Ultra HD quality.So, go ahead and take a look at that. Likewise, I do wanna notewhen it comes to the DSLR I was using all manual gives, except for white balance and when using theiPhone 11 Pro I was using all of the automated prepares, because I wanted to testout how Apple’s mentality in the camera efforts comparedto how my ability pieces operating a camera by hand. But to try to keep it somewhat fair, I try our best to invest no morethan 10 to 15 seconds setting up my manual shots on the DSLR.However, for the sake of thissomewhat loose experiment, I decided to do something different. On this photo, I skipped allof Apple’s automatic trickery and I led full manual usingAdobe Lightroom on my phone. One is shot in RAW, one is shot in JPG. Using the JPG mode we’regetting a little bit of that impressionist drawing glance again. So, it must be applyingsome kind of compression or other post-processingthat I’m not fully aware of, but I can see it happening ,’ cause in the RAW, precise same settles, taken within seconds of the other photo, or viceversa, we be understood that sounds, but we don’t see thatsplotchiness, because it’s RAW.And the cool thing is witha little bit of improvement, we can actually originate that RAWphoto look pretty dang good. That heyday looks really beautiful, and that was shot on this iPhone 11 Pro, but exercising the RAW modeinside of Lightroom , not Apple’s automatic Camera app. And then I took the photo, made some adjustments inside of Lightroom withexposure, foreground, shadows, vibrance, and sounds reduction, and that looks pretty frickin’good for a cell phone photo. Here’s another example withsomething that’s not a grow, but a bird instead. iPhone 11 Pro and the Canon7D Mark II, let’s zoom in. You’ll accompany we’re gettingthat cover gaze again around the details of theeye and those feathers on the 11 Pro, but on the Canonthose details are perpetuated. Here’s another examplewith some more flowers, and I want to point outanother thing here too. You’ll notice on the Canon7D photo the background is blurred out a lot more. The bokeh, the blurriness, isway bigger than on the 11 Pro. This Canon has a really, really big sense, well, that’s the mirror, butimagine the reflect was up.There’s a really big sensoron the inside of this thing that is ginormous comparedto the tiny little senors inside of this guy. The bigger the sensor, the bigger the bokeh, and yes, the focal sections were analogous give or take a millimeter or two. So, that is why the opticaldepth of battlefield lookings so much bigger, that itlooks so much more shallow, excuse me, on the DSLR photocompared to the iPhone photo. Now, yes, the iPhone hasthat extraordinary Portrait Mode which multiple cameras canwork together with software to computationally blur out the background through magical application. It can be kind of finicky at times, but if your theme is enclose right, the effects designs really well, and I’ll show you that in a few moments. Let’s zoom in here again. As you identify, you getsome of that fringy-ness and splotchiness even, especially with the out offocus parts on the grass. You are genuinely see thatkind of painting effect knocking in there, whereason the Canon photo those fine details are cured. So, let’s move to a further aspect. Let’s talk about dynamicrange for a second.I took my trusty aged iPhone 7 and opposed it against the iPhone 11 Pro, again, with automated settingsinside of Apple’s Camera app. So, one with the iPhone 7 has no HDR and the iPhone 11 Pro has SmartHDR Generation 2 kicking in and as you’ll notice itlooks like we were able to preserve quite a bitof that sky in there and that color in the iPhone 11 Pro photo. The one thing shed me offthough is that those buds look now like very counterfeit. So, it’s almost like theHDR effect, in my opinion, was going a little too strong there. You can turn it off in thesettings though if you wish. So , now I’m gonna do some portrait tests and I am here with my beautiful, inclined, volunteering, sober, un-hypnotized themes, am I right? – We hear and obey.- We hear and obey. – Exactly, so, they’re gonna help me out, and we’re gonna do sometests with the phone in the Portrait Mode andin the non-Portrait Mode and liken it to the DSLR. Let’s see what the results are like. So, here I have the samephoto, but one of them has Portrait Mode enabled at F 4.5, and one of them hasPortrait Mode disabled.I’m gonna compare that now tomy DSLR shot with no editing. So, the DSLR shot is RAW. That’s why it lookskind of flat and bland. No editing has been done. Right off the bat, youcan see we’re getting a really nice depth offield with that application breadth of realm on the 11 Pro, and also the sky is blue and rich, and it’s not blow out likeit is on the 7D Mark II, which also keep in mindis a somewhat older DSLR.Let’s make a coupleadjustments to the RAW data to try to match it, and asyou can see it’s getting much closer, because we havethat RAW data we can edit with. But again, you have toknow how the data productions, and you have to know how tomanipulate it to get that photo. Most shoppers won’t know how to do that, which is totally fine. For you, the iPhone will do the work.Let’s zoom in now andtake a look at the detail. You’ll notice, and keepin knowledge the light-green grass is not showing too much in my DSLR photo, because I had the camera angleda little bit differently. It wasn’t blown out, I justhad it tilted differently. You’ll too noticearound the subject’s ear in the Canon photo you’re getting a bit of a lettuce fringe.That’s a chroma aberration, and it’s more likely to happen with particular lenses on DSLRs. You probably will never seethat on a cell phone photo. Yeah, overall the iPhone 11 Pro photo is really clean, and another nice thing isbecause that magnitude of discipline is being processed insoftware any noise that is in the background is gonna get repressed by the blur effect it’s applying. So, the photo overall isgonna look a lot cleaner. I’m actually kind of blownaway by how well that works. I’m really impressed with that. Okay, so , now before wemove on to the next thing, I kind of want to testyour fun a little. I’m gonna substantiate you a marry photos, and you approximate whetheror not they were taken with the iPhone or with the Canon. So, here’s another subject I photographed. iPhone or Canon, what do you think? It was the iPhone, yes. Did you get onto right? Well, I hope you did. If you didn’t, that’s okay extremely. All title , now, let’s take alook at this beautiful Jaguar.Yes, look at that, beautifulcolor, beautiful showings. What was that shot with? Boom, iPhone 11 Pro, onlya little bit of revising was be done in order to that photo, but for the most part that was right off the iPhone 11 Pro. How about these raccoons kindof fighting over an apple? What do you think? Yup, that one was donewith the Canon 7D Mark II. What about these savory tabasco pepper, where if you eat them, I’m sure your tummy would burst into kindles? iPhone or DSLR? That one was with the iPhone, and if you inspect really closely you’ll see that kind of splotchypainting effect going on with the details in the peppersand in the grove texture. So, that’s kind of the tellthat it is an iPhone photo. What about this comfortable seem fox, really sleeping, having a good time? There’s a couple giveaways. What do you think? Yup, it is the 7D Mark II. The primary giveaway in my opinionwould be the focal section. This is a very tight photo. The iPhone 11, even the telephoto lens, cannot get that tight.I believe that was shot at 135, which is something that this lens goes to. So, that is the one primary giveaway there, and also that bokeh inthe background would be relatively hard to achieve, at least optically, on a cell phone. What about this one? This one has a quite clean seek. It’s not more loud. It’s got a neat shallow magnitude of battlefield. That was shot with the DSLR, right? Nope, that was actually shot with the iPhone 11 Pro, optically. No Portrait Mode was turned on for that, and you’re more likely toget better bokeh, optically, with the telephoto lensbecause if your aperture is consistent, and you tighten the shot, your bokeh’s gonna get a bit bigger. So, if you just wanted to dooptical breadth of domain, get tight with that telephoto lens. All liberty, so , now let’s moveinto some Night Mode stuff. So, this is kind of fun. I haven’t had a lot of practicaluses for Night Mode more, but I’m sure it’ll happen eventually.I’ve only had the phone for a week. So, I took a photo of somestars with the Night Mode enabled on my phone, andthen with long exposure and high-pitched ISO enabled on my DSLR, and to keep it fair, Ihandheld both of them. Surprisingly, the NightMode was able to stabilize the shot really well. On my DSLR, I had to keep the shutter open for at least a second to tryto get those idols in there, and because there is nomagical stabilization like in the iPhone thestars get actually streaky.So, the Night Mode workedrelatively well there. It’s a little boisterou, but atleast there’s no screen slow. Here’s another sample. I did some edits to thetemperature showings, highlight, shadows , noisereduction inside of Lightroom, but this was another NightMode shot of some stellars, and you’ll see with thetrees in the foreground there we lose a lot of thatdetail, but you get a lot of the low-light stuff disclosed. So, it’s not perfect, butit’s still pretty remarkable technology, especiallyin a consumer device, whatever it is you exactly press abutton and it does the thing.So, pretty impressive. However, there’s a coupleother great things. This is actually withNight Mode turned off. Hardly any sunrise was in the scene. It still looks pretty good. 640 ISO, 133 showing season. It was exposed for 1/30 thof a second , no shutter slowdown, or any of that stuff. It looks pretty frickin’nice , no Night Mode enabled. Here’s another one , noNight Mode enabled at all. It was able to pick up thosecolors and those light-footeds and it looks pretty darn clean.So, good racket, iPhone. Again, this is an unjust analogy, but it’s supposed to be. I’m just describe youwhat significant differences are. In my opinion, the iPhone1 1 Pro’s strong points are it has amazing portrait photography. It has fast automated designates. The Smart HDR Generation 2 is pretty nice. The stabilization for videoand Night Mode is astounding, and it fits in your pocket. Your best camera is theone you have with you. So, if a few moments happens, thisis gonna be in your pocket. This probably won’t be. So, keep that in mindtoo, and it’s easy to use, and another nice thing is you come that ultra wide lens for a really low cost. I know I didn’t talk about that too much, but get an ultra widelens on something like a DSLR is pretty expensive. The reality that that’s built into this phone is a really nice feature. So, use that to your advantage. Use that to not justget more in the enclose, but to be artistic. The weaker points are the noise and the loss of detailin those small areas we look back earlier, andwe don’t get the same type of magnitude of realm impact optically, because the sensor is really small, but keep in mind you havethat Portrait Mode effect where if you can getthat to work you are eligible to form some bokeh look prettynice in your photos.For DSLR, the strong pointsare the detail preservation, post-production flexibility with RAW data, but again, you need to knowhow the RAW data use, otherwise it’s useless to you. You have more lens options, because they are interchangeable, but again, that will come at a cost. That’s something you will have to decide if it works for your lifestyle or not.You get that visual magnitude of domain, and “youve had” more manual assures, which help you get thecomposition that you want, but you have to knowhow those holds wreak, otherwise you’re not gonnabe able to use them properly. The weak point, it doesn’tfit in your pocket, typically, and it’s unusable orunaffordable to most purchasers, and again, the best camerais the one you have with you. So, if you can’t yield this, or you don’t want to carry it around too much, this maynot be the option for you. You could stick with an iPhone 11 Pro, and it’s pretty frickin’ immense. Heck, maybe this is enough to replace that point and shoot you may carry around. So, that is what Iwanted to show you today, and you’ll have to take a look the stuff, cross-reference it with your lifestyle, and see how it works.Maybe you’ll upgrade to something, perhaps you’ll retain something, perhaps you’ll change to a totally different solution. Every person will have different needs. I’m not here to show you what’s best, I’m just now to showyou what’s different. If you have any questions, let me know in the comments down below, and feel free to give the video a rewatch to get moreinformation under your loop, and the full res tests are in the link in the description as well, so satisfy check those out. I hope you learned something. I hope you enjoyed. Catch the crazy and pass it on.( electronic music ).
Related posts
-
I was WRONG about the iPhone 11 Pro…
– Hey guys this is Austin. A little while ago, I made a video on why... -
Why Apple Wants Your Old iPhone
Apple has heavily promoted their trade-in program in recent years, encouraging users to give up their... -
The 1-inch iPhone Exists
– What's good guys, Keaton here. And what I got is something really crazy and interesting....