In the past five years, USB-C has become thego-to connector for a wide range of designs. Its used on most android phones , notebooks, tablets, activity consoles, headphones, and even accessories like mice, keyboards, and externalstorage drives. But when it comes to Apples most popularproduct, the iPhone, USB-C has yet to be adopted. Instead, every model of iPhone still usesa Lightning connector that was introduced eight years ago with the iPhone 5. This has led beings to wonder why Apple hasnttransitioned the iPhone to USB-C, especially for a company who has a reputation of beingthe first to adopt new standards.So in this video, Im going to explain whyApple hasnt transitioned the iPhone to USB-C, and what that mean for their consumers. This is Greg with Apple Explained, and youguys elected this topic into second place in the last poll. If youd like to help decide what topicsI cover in the future, dont forget to subscribe and referendums like this one will begin appearingin your portable act feed.Alright now why would Apple, the company whoadopted USB-A before anyone else with the original iMac, make so long to accompany USB-Cto their smartphones? Its jolly odd, extremely consideringtheyve already included it in their iPad and Mac lineup. Well, the answer lies in a narrative that beginsin 2010, when Apple was developing the iPhone 5. The device would be twelve percent smallerby volume compared to the previous 4S. Which represented the large 30 -pin connector neededto be replaced by something smaller in order to free up space for other components. At the time, Apple was helping to developthe USB-C standard with other fellowships like Intel, Microsoft, and Samsung.But the brand-new connector wouldnt be readyuntil 2014. Two times after the iPhone 5s handout. So because of the bad timing, Apple was forcedinto a region. They could either keep the 30 -pin connectorfor another two contemporaries and relinquish the iPhone 5 and 5s pact designings. Or they could create their own proprietaryconnector and justification fragmentation within not only the smartphone industry, but their ownproduct ecosystem. It was a lose-lose proposition, but Applewent with the latter alternative. That decision not only cause a huge amountof backlash from useds in 2012, who the hell annoyed that Apple made all of their previous iPhoneaccessories obsolete, but its still causing them issues to this very day. For example, when USB-C was ready to go in2 014, Apple wasnt in a position to transition the iPhone lineup a second time, merely twoyears later. They knew they had to stick with lightningfor as long as possible, or else they would be in for a PR nightmare.So they persisted, and when the AirPods wereintroduced in 2016, Apple was forced to use the same connector as the iPhone, since thetwo products were designed to be used together seamlessly. So Lightning was introduced to yet anotherproduct line. One that would expand into the AirPods Proand AirPods Max, which likewise had to use Lightning to maintain consistency between frameworks. Its almost like there was a smaller iPhoneecosystem that existed within the larger Apple ecosystem. Because while the iPhone and its accessoriescontinued to use Lightning, almost every other Apple product accepted USB-C. The MacBook linebegan transition periods in 2015, the iPad line in 2018, and the Mac Pro in 2019. You likewise have to consider the other controversialchanges Apple concluded with the iPhone in previous years. They removed the headphone jack in 2016, andthey removed the wall adapter from the iPhones packaging in 2020. Both of these decisions compelled perhaps evenmore backlash than the transition to Lightning in 2012, and compelled Apple to think twice beforemoving to USB-C, which would only add fuel to the fire. So how can we expect Apple to resolve thisconnector fragmentation issue in the future? Well, rumors are suggesting that it wontbe resolved, since Apple isnt planning on transitioning the iPhone to USB-C at all. Instead, theyre exploring the possibilityof removing the connector from sure-fire iPhone representations wholly. And there are benefits to this approach. A smartphone with no port would be more waterresistant since its framework could be completely sealed off. And it would be more durable. Since inserting and removing a connector thousandsof goes can cause wear, escalation of dusts, and contact questions. But how would the phone be charged withouta port? Well, Apple has already implemented a solutionwith the iPhone 12 lineup. The sits have something announced Magsafe, which is essentially a Qi wireless charger surrounded by a resound of magnets.This concludes the blame suffer very similarto an Apple Watch, a invention that too happens to be port-less. And if Apple wants to include wireless datapass through, there is an opportunity simply acquire the Smart Connector from the iPad. Everything Apple needs to create a port-lessiPhone already exists, and it simply seems to be a matter of time before they constitute the transitionaway from wired connectors exclusively. At that site, I picture each category of Appledevice will of their own unique methods of charging. Their computers and iPads, which Apple hasbeen calling computer replacements regardles, will feature USB-C. Their mobile manoeuvres likethe iPhone and Apple Watch will feature convenient grab-and-go magnetized wireless charging.While accessories like the AirPods, MagicMouse, and Magic Keyboard, will continue to use Lightning. With wireless accusing available when possibleas a accessibility peculiarity. Such approaches stimulates the most sense to me, but well have to wait and accompany what decisions Apple procreates with the exhaust of new productsin the very near future. Alright chaps thank you for having watching until theend, dont forget to subscribe to help decide which topics I embrace, and Ill see you inthe next video ..
