In the past five years, USB-C has become thego-to connector for a wide range of manoeuvres. Its spend on most android phones , notebooks, tablets, competition consoles, headphones, and even accessories like mouse, keyboards, and externalstorage drives. But when it comes to Apples most popularproduct, the iPhone, USB-C has yet to be adopted. Instead, every model of iPhone still usesa Lightning connector that was introduced eight years ago with the iPhone 5. This has already led beings to wonder why Apple hasnttransitioned the iPhone to USB-C, especially for a company who has a reputation of beingthe first to adopt new standards. So in this video, Im going to explain whyApple hasnt transitioned the iPhone to USB-C, and what that mean for their users. This is Greg with Apple Explained, and youguys elected this topic into second place in the last poll.If youd like to help decide what topicsI cover in the future, dont forget to subscribe and referendums like this one will begin appearingin your portable work feed. Alright now why would Apple, the company whoadopted USB-A before anyone else with the original iMac, make so long to introduce USB-Cto their smartphones? Its quite ludicrous, extremely consideringtheyve already included it in their iPad and Mac lineup. Well, the answer lies in a floor that beginsin 2010, when Apple was developing the iPhone 5. The device “wouldve been” twelve percentage smallerby loudnes compared to the previous 4S. Which symbolized the large 30 -pin connector neededto be replaced by something smaller in order to free up space for other factors. At the time, Apple was helping to developthe USB-C standard with other corporations like Intel, Microsoft, and Samsung. But the brand-new connector wouldnt be readyuntil 2014. Two times after the iPhone 5s liberate. So because of the bad timing, Apple was forcedinto a angle. They could either keep the 30 -pin connectorfor another two contemporaries and relinquish the iPhone 5 and 5s compact patterns. Or they could create their own proprietaryconnector and begin fragmentation within is not merely the smartphone industry, but their ownproduct ecosystem. It was a lose-lose proposition, but Applewent with the latter option. That decision not only cause a huge amountof backlash from users in 2012, who the hell stymie that Apple made all of their previous iPhoneaccessories obsolete, but its still causing them issues to this very day. For precedent, when USB-C was ready to go in2 014, Apple wasnt in a position to transition the iPhone lineup a second time, precisely twoyears later.They knew they had to stick with lightningfor as long as possible, or else they would be in for a PR nightmare. So they persisted, and when the AirPods wereintroduced in 2016, Apple was forced to use the same connector as the iPhone, since thetwo concoctions were designed to be used together seamlessly. So Lightning was introduced to yet anotherproduct line. One that would expand into the AirPods Proand AirPods Max, which also had to use Lightning to maintain consistency between mannequins. Its almost like there was a smaller iPhoneecosystem that existed within the larger Apple ecosystem. Because while the iPhone and its accessoriescontinued to use Lightning, almost every other Apple product borrowed USB-C. The MacBook linebegan transition periods in 2015, the iPad line in 2018, and the Mac Pro in 2019. You too have to consider the other controversialchanges Apple reached with the iPhone in previous years. They removed the headphone jack in 2016, andthey removed the wall adapter from the iPhones packaging in 2020. Both of these decisions generated perhaps evenmore backlash than the transition to Lightning in 2012, and compelled Apple to think twice beforemoving to USB-C, which would only add fuel to the fire. So how can we expect Apple to resolve thisconnector fragmentation issue in the future? Well, rumors are suggesting that it wontbe resolved, since Apple isnt planning on transitioning the iPhone to USB-C at all. Instead, theyre exploring the possibilityof removing the connector from specific iPhone mannequins only. And there are benefits to this approach. A smartphone with no port would be more waterresistant since its chassis could be completely sealed off. And it would be more durable. Since inserting and removing a connector thousandsof ages can cause wear, buildup of junks, and contact problems. But how would the phone be charged withouta port? Well, Apple has already implemented a solutionwith the iPhone 12 lineup.The simulates got something announced Magsafe, which is essentially a Qi wireless charger surrounded by a echo of magnets. This attains the charge ordeal very similarto an Apple Watch, a maneuver that also happens to be port-less. And if Apple wants to include wireless datapass through, they can simply acquire the Smart Connector from the iPad. Everything Apple needs to create a port-lessiPhone already exists, and it exclusively seems to be a matter of time before they establish the transitionaway from wired connectors entirely. At that stage, I repute each category of Appledevice will of their own unique methods of charging. Their computers and iPads, which Apple hasbeen calling computer replacements anyway, will feature USB-C. Their mobile designs likethe iPhone and Apple Watch will peculiarity accessible grab-and-go magnetic wireless charging.While supplementaries like the AirPods, MagicMouse, and Magic Keyboard, will continue to use Lightning. With wireless charging accessible when possibleas a accessibility feature. Such approaches meets the most sense to me, but well have to wait and see what decisions Apple procreates with the liberation of new productsin the near future. Alright chaps thank you for having watching until theend, dont forget to subscribe to help decide which topics I report, and Ill see you inthe next video ..
Why iPhones Don’t Use USB-C
