In the past five years, USB-C has become thego-to connector for a wide range of designs. Its used on most android phones , notebooks, tablets, activity consoles, headphones, and even supplements like mice, keyboards, and externalstorage drives. But when it comes to Apples most popularproduct, the iPhone, USB-C has yet to be adopted. Instead, every model of iPhone still usesa Lightning connector that was introduced eight years ago with the iPhone 5. This has already led people to wonder why Apple hasnttransitioned the iPhone to USB-C, especially for a company who has a reputation of beingthe first to adopt new standards. So in this video, Im going to explain whyApple hasnt transitioned the iPhone to USB-C, and what that mean for their useds. This is Greg with Apple Explained, and youguys elected this subject into second place in the last poll. If youd like to help decide what topicsI cover in the future, dont forget to subscribe and ballots like this one will begin appearingin your portable pleasure feed. Alright now why would Apple, the company whoadopted USB-A before anyone else with the original iMac, make so long to impart USB-Cto their smartphones? Its jolly quirky, peculiarly consideringtheyve already included it in their iPad and Mac lineup.Well, the answer lies in a floor that beginsin 2010, when Apple was developing the iPhone 5. The device would be twelve percent smallerby volume compared to the previous 4S. Which necessitated the large 30 -pin connector neededto be replaced by something smaller in order to be allowed to to free up space for other ingredients. At the time, Apple was helping to developthe USB-C standard with other business like Intel, Microsoft, and Samsung. But the new connector wouldnt be readyuntil 2014. Two years after the iPhone 5s handout. So because of the bad timing, Apple was forcedinto a area. They could either keep the 30 -pin connectorfor another two generations and relinquish the iPhone 5 and 5s pact designs. Or they could create their own proprietaryconnector and cause fragmentation within is not simply the smartphone industry, but their ownproduct ecosystem.It was a lose-lose proposition, but Applewent with the latter alternative. That decision not only cause a huge amountof backlash from customers in 2012, who were frustrated that Apple made all of their previous iPhoneaccessories obsolete, but its still causing them issues to this very day. For instance, when USB-C was ready to go in2 014, Apple wasnt in a position to transition the iPhone lineup a second time, simply twoyears later. They knew they had to stick with lightningfor as long as possible, or else they would be in for a PR nightmare. So they persisted, and when the AirPods wereintroduced in 2016, Apple was forced to use the same connector as the iPhone, since thetwo makes were designed to be used together seamlessly. So Lightning was introduced to yet anotherproduct line.One that would expand into the AirPods Proand AirPods Max, which also had to use Lightning to maintain consistency between prototypes. Its almost like there was a smaller iPhoneecosystem that existed within the larger Apple ecosystem. Because while the iPhone and its accessoriescontinued to use Lightning, almost every other Apple product endorse USB-C. The MacBook linebegan transition periods in 2015, the iPad line in 2018, and the Mac Pro in 2019. You also have to consider the other controversialchanges Apple spawned with the iPhone in previous years. They removed the headphone jack in 2016, andthey removed the wall adapter from the iPhones packaging in 2020. Both of these decisions made perhaps evenmore backlash than the transition to Lightning in 2012, and started Apple to think twice beforemoving to USB-C, which would only add fuel to the fire. So how can we expect Apple to resolve thisconnector fragmentation issue in the future? Well, rumors are suggesting that it wontbe resolved, since Apple isnt planning on transitioning the iPhone to USB-C at all. Instead, theyre exploring the possibilityof removing the connector from particular iPhone prototypes altogether. And there are benefits to this approach. A smartphone with no port would be more waterresistant because it framework could be completely sealed off.And it is even more durable. Since inserting and removing a connector thousandsof times can cause wear, proliferation of junks, and contact publishes. But how would the phone be charged withouta port? Well, Apple has already implemented a solutionwith the iPhone 12 lineup. The mannequins got something called Magsafe, which is essentially a Qi wireless charger surrounded by a doughnut of magnets. This stirs the bill know very similarto an Apple Watch, a device that likewise happens to be port-less. And if Apple wants to include wireless datapass through, they can simply acquire the Smart Connector from the iPad. Everything Apple needs to create a port-lessiPhone already exists, and it simply seems to be a matter of time before they conclude the transitionaway from cabled connectors entirely.At that extent, I envision each category of Appledevice will of their own unique methods of charging. Their computers and iPads, which Apple hasbeen calling computer replacements anyway, will peculiarity USB-C. Their mobile machines likethe iPhone and Apple Watch will boast handy grab-and-go magnetized wireless billing. While supplements like the AirPods, MagicMouse, and Magic Keyboard, will continue to use Lightning. With wireless billing available when possibleas a gadget peculiarity. This approach stimulates the most sense to me, but well have to wait and find what decisions Apple prepares with the release of new productsin the near future. Alright guys thanks for watching until theend, dont forget to subscribe to help decide which topics I treat, and Ill see you inthe next video ..
